We conjecture that the radius of our Realm of Persistance our what we may colloquially refer to as, “universe,” is the magnitued of 1/lp expressed in meters.
We claim this closed form for the planck mass boundary can be used as a scalar for additional significant digits. Our model is based on the conjectured derangements that correspond with the magnitude of the notation. lp is 10^-35 meters so we take the magnitude |-35|= and claim a total of 35 things compose this action. (We await cool new experiments. :))
We conjecture that the radius of our Realm of Persistance our what we may colloquially refer to as, “universe,” is the magnitued of 1/lp expressed in meters.
We claim this closed form for the planck mass boundary can be used as a scalar for additional significant digits. Our model is based on the conjectured derangements that correspond with the magnitude of the notation. lp is 10^-35 meters so we take the magnitude |-35|= and claim a total of 35 things compose this action. (We await cool new experiments. :))
We claim this closed form for the planck mass boundary can be used as a scalar for additional significant digits. Our model is based on the conjectured derangements that correspond with the magnitude of the notation. lp is 10^-35 meters so we take the magnitude |-35|= and claim a total of 35 things compose this action. (We await cool new experiments. :))
In[3]:=
E^x/Sinh[Sinh[1/7]] == 7*5
Out[3]=
x
1
7
In[4]:=
(sinh(sinh(1/7)))^-1 e^x=7*5
***Note that if one does not have meters on the outside one would get reciprical meters. This seems absolutely absurd! Unless we were working within a system balanced by inversion.***
***Note that if one does not have meters on the outside one would get reciprical meters. This seems absolutely absurd! Unless we were working within a system balanced by inversion.***
***Note that if one does not have meters on the outside one would get reciprical meters. This seems absolutely absurd! Unless we were working within a system balanced by inversion.***
In[1]:=
Out[1]=
6.18712649114395×
34
10
m
In[2]:=
1/(1.616259181756453*10^-35) meters
We take this an plug it into the hypersphere formula assuming 4 dimensional in our 3+1 dimensional spacetime.
We take this an plug it into the hypersphere formula assuming 4 dimensional in our 3+1 dimensional spacetime.
In[1]:=
((2*Pi^(4/2))/(4*Gamma[4/2]))*6.18712649114395323233414204843495409975043703487645194304799`60.70000000000001*^34^4
Out[1]=
7.23145569017205582379859659493303647829308098723599783102993×
139
10
((2pi^(4/2))/(4 Gamma(4/2)))(6.18712649114395323233414204843495409975043703487645194304799 × 10^34 meters)^4
Out[2]=
Or using natural language we can ask Wolfram Alpha this:
Or using natural language we can ask Wolfram Alpha this:
Or using natural language we can ask Wolfram Alpha this:
In[10]:=
(-Subscript[c, 1] + Subscript[x, 1])^2 + (-Subscript[c, 2] + Subscript[x, 2])^2 + (-Subscript[c, 3] + Subscript[x, 3])^2 + (-Subscript[c, 4] + Subscript[x, 4])^2 == 3.82805342174152867955`20.582977989869086*10^69
Out[10]=
2
(-)
x
1
c
1
2
(-)
x
2
c
2
2
(-)
x
3
c
3
2
(-)
x
4
c
4
69
10
In[11]:=
hypersphere 4 dimensional radius (6.187126491143953232334*10^34 meters)
So what does this all mean. I don’t know. But I am pretty sure some smart person does. ^.^
So what does this all mean. I don’t know. But I am pretty sure some smart person does. ^.^
So what does this all mean. I don’t know. But I am pretty sure some smart person does. ^.^