Computational Essay
Computational Essay
PeterCullenBurbery
In this essay I will solve problems from the 2022 MIT Integration Bee Regular Season Problems.
In[]:=
100
∫
0
x
xOut[]=
715
In[]:=
x
Log[1+x]
2
x
Out[]=
Log[x]-Log[1+x]-
Log[1+x]
x
In[]:=
x//FullSimplify//TraditionalForm
Log[1+x]
2
x
Out[]//TraditionalForm=
log(x)-
(x+1)log(x+1)
x
In[]:=
π
2
∫
π
2
Out[]=
π
2
In[]:=
2
∫
-2
Out[]=
19
3
In[]:=
TimeConstrained∫(2020-8084)x,8
2019
Sin[x]
2019
Cos[x]
2021
Sin[x]
2021
Cos[x]
Out[]=
$Aborted
I gave up and decided to solve the integral symbolically.
In[]:=
∫b-8084x
b-1
Sin[x]
b-1
Cos[x]
c
Sin[x]
c
Cos[x]
Out[]=
-2+b
Cos[x]
2-b
2
()
2
Cos[x]
2-b
2
b
2
2+b
2
2
Sin[x]
b
Sin[x]
1
1+c
-1+c
Cos[x]
1-c
2
()
2
Cos[x]
1-c
2
1+c
2
3+c
2
2
Sin[x]
1+c
Sin[x]
In[]:=
∫b-4cx
b-1
Sin[x]
b-1
Cos[x]
c
Sin[x]
c
Cos[x]
Out[]=
-2+b
Cos[x]
2-b
2
()
2
Cos[x]
2-b
2
b
2
2+b
2
2
Sin[x]
b
Sin[x]
1
1+c
-1+c
Cos[x]
1-c
2
()
2
Cos[x]
1-c
2
1+c
2
3+c
2
2
Sin[x]
1+c
Sin[x]
In[]:=
N∫b-4cx/.{b->2020.,c->2021.}
b-1
Sin[x]
b-1
Cos[x]
c
Sin[x]
c
Cos[x]
Out[]=
I think Mathematica loses this round.
In[]:=
+1x
3+2+1
3
x
2
x
3
3
x
Out[]=
(1+x)
2/3
(1+)
3
x
In[]:=
+1x//FullSimplify//TraditionalForm//AbsoluteTiming
3+2+1
3
x
2
x
3
3
x
Out[]=
10.031,(x+1)
2/3
(+1)
3
x
In[]:=
x
1
4
Sin[x]
4
Cos[x]
Out[]=
--Cot[x]++Tan[x]
8Cot[x]
3
1
3
2
Csc[x]
8Tan[x]
3
1
3
2
Sec[x]
In[]:=
x//FullSimplify//TraditionalForm//AbsoluteTiming
1
4
Sin[x]
4
Cos[x]
Out[]=
0.0696823,(cos(6x)-3cos(2x))(x)(x)
1
6
3
csc
3
sec
Mathematica loses this round in terms of a simpler solution.
In[]:=
x//TraditionalForm
x+Sin[x]
1+Cos[x]
Out[]//TraditionalForm=
xtan
x
2
In[]:=
∫xx//TraditionalForm
3
Sinh[x]
2
Cosh[x]
Out[]//TraditionalForm=
450sinh(x)+25sinh(3x)-9sinh(5x)-450xcosh(x)-75xcosh(3x)+45xcosh(5x)
3600
In[]:=
∫xx//FullSimplify//TraditionalForm
3
Sinh[x]
2
Cosh[x]
Out[]//TraditionalForm=
450sinh(x)+25sinh(3x)-9sinh(5x)+120x(3cosh(2x)-7)(x)
3
cosh
3600
Mathematica also loses this round to the MIT bee unfortunately.
∫
In[]:=
∫x//FullSimplify//TraditionalForm
x
4
x
2
3
Out[]//TraditionalForm=
x
2
3
x
2
log(2)(3)
2
log
I think Mathematica wins this because Mathematica's answer is slightly simpler.
I think Mathematica has a more complex form than the answer.
This outputted an error message but Mathematica still got the right answer!
I wasn't able to obtain a solution for this.
I'm not sure how to solve this problem: